All projects
seeking partner

What turns an impressive LLM demo into a confident buying decision?

Compare capability-led demonstrations with workflow- and outcome-led demonstrations to learn what moves qualified buyers from “wow” to a concrete next step.

WHAT YOU CAN EXPECT

Evidence protects you in both directions.

01
Illustrative result · threshold met

2.1× · qualified pilot intent

SalespersonIllustrative result · threshold met
2.1×

qualified pilot intent

A demo built around the buyer's own workflow and a measurable before/after outcome outperformed a broad capability showcase.

What your study would pin down

You get a demo sequence by buyer role: which workflow to show, which proof removes objections, and which next step moves qualified prospects toward a pilot.

Decision

Make the workflow-first demo the default enterprise sales motion.

Public precedent · not your resultKlue / InDebted

Customer-reported interactive-demo results included 3× demo-to-opportunity conversion and 6× higher conversion among demo viewers.

Navattic’s 2025 report quotes Klue saying its Demo Arena generated $1M in new pipeline and 3× demo-to-opportunity conversion versus isolated product pages; InDebted reported demo viewers were 6× more likely to convert.

Source: Navattic 2025 · customer-reported ↗The precedent shows the effect can exist elsewhere. Your study determines whether, where, and how strongly it holds for your customers, workflows, and economics.
02
Decision

Evidence protects you in both directions.

SalespersonThreshold not met · do not scale
What the data may show

No meaningful effect

If the intervention does not clear the predefined threshold, that is evidence against spending more to build, launch, or scale it in this context.

Decision

Do not scale the demo format.

SalespersonThreshold met · value left unused
The other expensive error

A real opportunity can still be left on the table.

If the intervention clears the threshold but the business keeps the current approach, measurable savings, revenue, adoption, or risk reduction may remain unrealized.

Decision

Act only when the measured opportunity is large enough to justify the change.

03
Source

Public precedent · not your result

Comparable public caseMD Anderson

$62M and five years — before Watson was used on an actual patient.

MD Anderson’s IBM Watson oncology project accumulated about $62 million in costs. JNCI reported that the contract ended before the system was used on actual patients.

Source: Journal of the National Cancer Institute ↗Comparable public case — not a claim that this study would have prevented the event.
HYPOTHESIS

A workflow-first demo built around the buyer’s own job-to-be-done and a measurable before/after outcome will increase qualified next-step intent by at least 12 percentage points versus a capability showcase, without increasing perceived implementation risk.

PRIMARY METRIC

Qualified next-step intent: trial, pilot, procurement conversation, or equivalent sponsor-defined action.

MEANINGFUL THRESHOLD

+12 percentage points qualified next-step intent with no meaningful increase in perceived implementation risk.

BUSINESS TARGET

Evidence for which demo structure is worth field-testing in sales; not a guarantee of pipeline or revenue.

DECISION RULES

Threshold met

Field-test the demo structure with a limited sales cohort.

Intent rises but implementation risk also rises

Add implementation evidence and retest.

No meaningful effect

Do not scale the demo format.

Business outcomes are research targets, not guarantees. A null or negative result may still create substantial value by preventing investment in an ineffective product, feature, or campaign.

Population

Qualified prospects or realistic buyer proxies in a sponsor-defined segment.

Intervention

Demo structured around one customer workflow, measurable outcome, implementation assumptions, and evidence.

Comparator

Broad capability showcase emphasizing model breadth and intelligence.

Secondary metrics

Purchase consideration · Ability to explain value internally · Perceived implementation risk · Willingness to pay · Recall

MAKE IT YOUR DECISION

Turn this research question into a decision for your business.

We adapt the population, intervention, thresholds, and economics to your customers. The result may tell you to scale, to stop spending, or to act on an opportunity you are currently leaving unused. Each of those is a useful business decision when the evidence is strong enough.

The goal is not a positive result. The goal is evidence strong enough to change a real decision.

Design this study for your business

What customer or commercial decision should the evidence strengthen?

You know the opportunity. Tell us the decision and choose the outcomes that would make the result useful.

Your role
What should the study help you measure?
Draft the conversation

Your email app opens with the draft; this site stores nothing.